Jump to content

Stopandstep has a channel to help the UKGC


fkthesystem

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, fkthesystem said:

He helped put an end to bookmakers FOBT machines higher stakes.... and has helped put an end to Bonus buys. He isn't allowed in many bookmakers now. This is because they know he is helping turn people against these types of games. He has a remarkable amount of people complaining about him playing in bookmakers 6 days out of 7 per week, yet every time i call him out for his bullshit... my comment is spammed. How can people complain month after month about what they are watching him do, rather than just not watch? He is low key paid to turn people against land based high stakes, when it is available online still . It is not the UKGC looking after problem gamblers, it is the fact higher stakes and bonus buys is equal to less tax, rake and less problem gamblers. The UKGC are fake. They want to tax Casinos/bookmakers as much as possible and they want problem gamblers, too. They are not protecting anybody. The more put off a gambler might become, the less it benefits them in regards for tax. The less time spent playing , the less likely people are to return. The gambling controls are to benefit the state and not the people. Stop and step is working to help them.  

Bookies slots uploaded this week to his channel ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

UKGC gets its money from gambling companies/sponsors/lottery operators if im not mistaken

Same as the regulators who regulate video games  (doing everything in their power to keep loot boxes in video games which is advertising gambling to children)

but the regulators are turning a blind eye because ....

 

£ 

 

Edited by 4houghts
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, centipede said:

Fuck sake, not another conspiracy moron on here spouting shit

I am glad you use that word. The Governments overuse that word when trying to discredit people that caught onto the truth... it is an attempt to label them as none important and not to be believed. Yet i can also label you the same for your opinion. The only problem i have, is all yous mother fckers have a reputation to keep and i don't. I also don't like the UKGC, THE STATE OR ANY BALL LICKING fudgerS THAT SUPPORT THEM. So here i am attacked from all angles and labeled crazy simply for not supporting any act they wish to wrongfully impose on other people for their own gain. Not to mention the fact that not one single mother fcker here can tell me (in facts) that something fcking fishy isn't going on. That all this fake concern for the British public isn't a load of fake wank and a bigger scam than any online or landbased slot around. I'm happy to divide people like yous, you are literally all brainwahed into believing the state have your best interest at heart, when the reality is... even your food and water is being poisoned lol. Im'a going down fighting and called a nut case, i want my dignity in tact. Yous mother fckers can continue to gain a reputation on a gambling forum that actually means nothing in the real world. Goodnight and God bless. No Surrender.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, fkthesystem said:

The only problem i have, is all yous mother fckers have a reputation to keep and i don't

 

2 minutes ago, fkthesystem said:

Yous mother fckers can continue to gain a reputation on a gambling forum that actually means nothing in the real world

Fuck sake make your mind up ?

  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, fkthesystem said:

Just like all them comments underneath hating on them. Great way to publicly discredit them as a bad thing... ummm?

Your argument kind of reminds me of that scene in breaking bad where jessie goes to rehab and tries selling drugs to the addicts who are trying to quit 

  • Keeemon 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, VillaLad said:

No that’s stopnsteps fault aswell I seen him play Fifa once ?

 

8 minutes ago, 4houghts said:

UKGC gets its money from gambling companies/sponsors/lottery operators if im not mistaken

Same as the regulators who regulate video games  (doing everything in their power to keep loot boxes in video games which is advertising gambling to children)

but the regulators are turning a blind eye because ....

 

£ 
Even Donald trump will blame computer games for the death and destruction in America, rather than take responsibility for the guns, racist hate and twisted politics the Governments spread and sell on a daily basis. THEY WILL DO WHAT THEY WANT FOR MONEY AND BLAME OTHERS TO WORM THEIR WAY OUT. JUST LIKE THE UKGC/ GOVERNMENT. BLAME FOBT'S AND BONUS BUYS, WHEN THE REALITY IS IT SIMPLY GOES AGAINST THEIR RAKE, TAXES AND AMOUNT OF ADDICTED GAMBLERS THAT AREN'T BANNED ON GAMSTOP. They simply want more tax, more power, more personal information, more data and more information on every spin, bet or penny spent. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Lighty45 said:

You stated he is banned from all bookmakers ? ? ? 

I didn't actually. If you took the time to read properly, you will see paddy power and william hill are paranoid for a good reason. So much so, he can't go in to play. Among other places, too. Ladbrokes. .. so on. If you think i am wrong, ask him... or ask him to reply to this thread as i am continuously silenced on his channel, compared to those hating on forms of gambling on a gambling channel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, beajos111 said:

This entire thread is nonsense??‍♀️thank you NEXT!

That's fantastic. You have an opinion. would you like to share with people how you came to that decision? Would you also like to tell me how i am wrong? The fckn truth of the matter is, all i have had from narrow minded thinking people is remarks on how my judgement isn't based on facts. Yet it is and several comments i made can be confirmed through watching his videos, talking about statistics, research and common sense. You could also confirm everything i said about him not being allowed into william hill, ladbrokes and paddy powers to play slots when others can play any time they like. They can even record, too. So why all the paranoia over somebody like him from all them people working for them bookmakers and not just fcking me?
I sat on the side line for a lot longer than them to come to my conclusion. My information and decision making is INFORMED. You are just a narrow minded eejit looking to believe what you like. You say the whole thread is nonsense in one and only that one comment. I can't change that. Although, i'd at least expect a decent reply and a little information on how you are right about me being wrong. I know that isn't going to happen though, i know you probably haven't watched a few videos of his never mind all of them. so... i KNOW I AM BETTER INFORMED TO MAKE A PRESUMPTION. I also know i am not biased, anti FOBT or Bonus buys and PRO state control over every aspect of my personal life, spending or well being. 

Edited by fkthesystem
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, fkthesystem said:

He helped put an end to bookmakers FOBT machines higher stakes.... and has helped put an end to Bonus buys. He isn't allowed in many bookmakers now. This is because they know he is helping turn people against these types of games. He has a remarkable amount of people complaining about him playing in bookmakers 6 days out of 7 per week, yet every time i call him out for his bullshit... my comment is spammed. How can people complain month after month about what they are watching him do, rather than just not watch? He is low key paid to turn people against land based high stakes, when it is available online still . It is not the UKGC looking after problem gamblers, it is the fact higher stakes and bonus buys is equal to less tax, rake and less problem gamblers. The UKGC are fake. They want to tax Casinos/bookmakers as much as possible and they want problem gamblers, too. They are not protecting anybody. The more put off a gambler might become, the less it benefits them in regards for tax. The less time spent playing , the less likely people are to return. The gambling controls are to benefit the state and not the people. Stop and step is working to help them.  

How does higher stakes and bonus buys = less tax?

Are you on the side of step and step for playing in the bookmakers and showing how shit it is? Still can't tell if this is praise or hate towards him

perhaps a wee hello from the cartoon fella might sort you out

 

  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Malkychamp said:

How does higher stakes and bonus buys = less tax?

Are you on the side of step and step for playing in the bookmakers and showing how shit it is? Still can't tell if this is praise or hate towards him

perhaps a wee hello from the cartoon fella might sort you out

 

It means less rake, less gambling and less addiction. Are people going to want to keep gambling if they lose a lot on one go or if they become addicted losing a lot over a long period of time? Who is more likely to end up on gamstop? The addicted ones that always play.. or the ones losing a lot without anywhere near as much fun? I think you will find the "so called" protecting the public with bullshit like this is trying to encourage them to lose as much or more over a longer period of time. Thus causing more addiction and looking like an effort is being made to stop heavy gambling losses/ addictions. If they really wanted to protect the player, they would have put an end to reverse withdrawals among many other things. All you have to do is open your eyes, think about what is actually happening and consider what could have been done that was not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Malkychamp said:

How does higher stakes and bonus buys = less tax?

Are you on the side of step and step for playing in the bookmakers and showing how shit it is? Still can't tell if this is praise or hate towards him

perhaps a wee hello from the cartoon fella might sort you out

 

High stakes still exist as well. God forbid somebody actually wants to see what the fcking bonus can do though, for the same price as one spin. No no, can't be allowed. They might end up disappointed too soon and give up trying to get a decent one because they need several thousand spins before they get it. I sometimes think people are brainwashed just and refuse to accept that everything (most of the time) that happens isn't actually to benefit their health.  It is to make others look good or help them make a lot of money without any hassle. Like cheep unhealthy food or the fact people need to buy bottled water. Nothing is cheaper for your sake. It is so greedy fudgers can make more money without as much cost. Most people that gamble don't understand this, as they gamble. That would incline they aren't as concerned about money as others. The ones that don't gamble and profit from a gambler while acting like they care about their losses are the real fudgers ya wana watch out for. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, fkthesystem said:

It means less rake, less gambling and less addiction. Are people going to want to keep gambling if they lose a lot on one go or if they become addicted losing a lot over a long period of time? Who is more likely to end up on gamstop? The addicted ones that always play.. or the ones losing a lot without anywhere near as much fun? I think you will find the "so called" protecting the public with bullshit like this is trying to encourage them to lose as much or more over a longer period of time. Thus causing more addiction and looking like an effort is being made to stop heavy gambling losses/ addictions. If they really wanted to protect the player, they would have put an end to reverse withdrawals among many other things. All you have to do is open your eyes, think about what is actually happening and consider what could have been done that was not. 

I have heard of 'rake' when playing poker however this has nothing to do with slots (high stakes or bonus buys) 

Taking away these things makes people more likely to play longer and become addicted? Highly disagree infact i would predict quite the opposite. Higher stakes players wouldn't get the same 'buzz' for lack of better words and just stop playing. Playing once or for years on end either 1 can sign up to gamstop none less likely than the other. You could lose £10 or £10000 and sign up. I would argue its more a personal decision to improve themself rather than games available.

The reverse withdrawals thing isn't really protecting the player either as to have got to that point they must have already gambled right... would a better argument not be just ban all casino/gambling sites? 

  • Puke! 1
  • Keeemon 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless I’m mistaken, on the few videos of his before falling asleep, he used to use bonus buys; even doing videos using only those. 
 

I’ve never known him be banned from a bookies, only banned. 
 

For gods sake @VillaLad, use some punctuation and grammar, you illiterate twat!
 

Good enough insult?

  • Shocked! 1
  • Love 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...