Leaderboard

My first admin job was taking calls from the army ref building repairs to their homes. I was 18 and yet these two names would stay with me forever....trying to stay professional and not laugh my ass off was difficult!! Major Beever Captain Whatmuff

Well done @Chrissy_M and @4houghts on ur success at a tricky festival.. gotta take my hat off to @4houghts in particular, it's a toss of the coin between him and @therealwintersoldier who has the sharpest eye with the ponies, always up there in the leaderboard with the racing comps.

@phil_igp if a streamer has streams with multiple people on them (chip for example, has his two sidekicks who stream without chip but on the same channel), do you verify all of them and their bank statements/casino account pages/money in etc..? Just two of your 'verified' streams for chipstunkz he wasn't even on them, as in he was in the UK whilst the other two streamed from Ireland. Ive doubted they had their own accounts for a while, especially after chip showed deposits/cash out screenshots on his twitter which appeared to all come from the same bank account. Now this is breaking all the rules isnt it by using someone elses deposit method and/or casino account. so can you confirm, did all 3 streamers on his channel provide separate bank accounts to get verified?

Tinkering whilst watching the athletics 1000x Base Game Hit

Arrive on the shore in a dinghy and you will get escorted to a 5 star hotel room with no covid BS to put up with whatsoever.

I have no idea how he did me last time he was doing some sorcery

Good point from our resident man of law. Your the first lawyer I'll think of if I'm up in front of the beak at Airdrie Sheriff court @Tricky0212.

I have posted this before but I do believe it is relevant to the argument of the industry being able to regulate itself because in particular it refers to the fact that casino games are pushed at young people especially and that it is highly addictive I have seen it described as the crack cocaine of gambling. https://www.rte.ie/news/primetime/2021/0708/1233948-paddy-power-founder-stewart-kenny-online-gambling/ This article also says that the frontal lobe of the brain which gives us control over impulses is not fully developed until people are 25/26 years of age Many people get dragged into this at far too young an age and hopefully with more and more research being done and being financed properly it will only lead the future regulators to do the right thing and make it harder to gamble without proper checks being done before a person is allowed to bet and not after they have lost everything

A lot of those industries are renowned for working from the inside to keep the money flowing despite the risks to the public which they had knowledge of. The fact is that you are from within the industry and it all it looks like to me is that you are trying to make sure that the streamers can carry on and thus direct traffic to sites on which your company works. It will not take long for that traffic to slow down considerably if governments crack down on streamers and promotion of casinos. To me all you are doing is trying to invent some sort of verification so you can go to regulators and say please do not do this as we have a legitimate way of weeding out the fakes to protect people. At the end of the day do not say this is being done in any way to "protect gamblers" because that is just not so and it is also why the industry is being clamped down on so hard by regulators.

Here is an interesting document from the World Bank entitled COVID-19 STRATEGIC PREPAREDNESS AND RESPONSE PROGRAM https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/993371585947965984/pdf/World-COVID-19-Strategic-Preparedness-and-Response-Project.pdf You can read through it but if you can't be bothered if you turn to page 6 there is a section stating the expected end date which is 2025. this is not the first plan I have seen with 2025 as the planned end date. Canadian Prime Minister Justin Truedope has just prepaid contracts to Pfizer for "booster shots" all the way up to 2025 as well.

I mean anybody can say it. But if you actually did youd probably change your opinion. The AA are a trusted brand as they were first. They grew and people took notice. Thats what we are doing. There is no accrediting body for this. We have to build it then take it to the MGA and UKGC and SGA. Thats the plan. We cant do that without having actually done any. We are. I am. Im COO and im absolving the costs into my departments. Once we charge soon the money from that will go towards wages etc. We are financing it. There is no backers. Im financing it personally from our company by using existing staff (KYC, SEO, Website) and i hired one person who im putting without our structure. Without sounding like a dick, there is a lot of money in gaming, and a tiny part of this to "give something back" is the right thing to do. Thats on case by case. If they are pushing a casino who has a history of utter bullshit then sure we will look at it. But affilaites, and it pains me to say this, all advertise mostly the same casinos to the same people. If your have 10 shops next to each other on the high street all selling kitchenware, your gonna do everything you can to get some uniqie brands in your store so people turn up and you make money. Same for streamers i figure, that one casino people havent played on is always going to be pushed. I really hope he does. If hes legit ill take back everything i ever said. But my god we would ask for 4 years of documents. Youve never met trip advisor but they are ok to you? Ive never heard of you... doesnt mean i dont have the time to listen to what your saying. The point here, and ill be blunt, is what you all think doesnt really matter. This is a tiny subsection of the people who watch gambling streams. Most of the people replying are conspiracy loving, problem finding people. And thats fine, be my guest. But nothing we are doing or verifying is in any way even slightly incorrect. We have an accredited team of KYC agents verifying streamers documents. We literally cannot get any better staff to do this. They have full igaming and MGA training and guidance, its as good as it gets. They literally verify documents for a living. If anyone has any questions around this, around the process, wants to come here or come on skype and be part of the process - then the invitiation is open and ill buy you a steak if you come here or spare a couple of hours on skype with my team to guide you through it. However - the negativity is amazing. Its honestly a bit disappointing that the world of watching streamers has come to the point where people are wanting a system that will check the fakes and the bullshitters, and then we create one, and people dont think its legitimate. Noone can work out why its covered by me and my company? Easy. As the affiliation world is full of shite, and noone is doing anything about it. The doping agency who tests olympic athletes came from somewhere. They slowly got approved around the world, that is the same plan for this. We created a verification system as I believe, and many others do, that fake streamers are a stain on the community and the industry. I care more about that that i do about the feelings of the people watching, thats their choice if they want to close their eyes and believe 200k deposits are real. But this affects what i do for a living also. Regulators will clamp down on things soon, or do what they always do, which is not understand something and close it down (look at bonus buys as an example here). If they do that your all fucked. So consider this my attempt at solving a problem before it gets insane, as right now more and more streamers are starting affiliation and pushing casinos, and without something like this, the whole thing comes crashing down at some point once a regulator takes a stance against it. Also - noone has yet grasped the idea that this doesnt make us money. We dont benefit from verifying someone. No links. No sponsorships. Nothing. If we verify say Jimbo, he isnt giving us money for that yet. When he does it wont cover the cost. So whats the purpose of spending money ont he system and the agents if its not "for a good cause"? Say jimbo only streams at videoslots, like Bandit right now, we arent videoslots, we wont benefit from that. This is like someone checking tickets on a bus and you saying he isnt qualified to check tickets and you refuse to show him your ticket. The bus company pays for that person to make sure everyone on the bus has paid for their seat.

Another super comp so a massive thanks to 1p for all the graft put in And gratz to @4houghts & @Chrissy_M for a good weeks tipping . Good stuff

Astra Zeneca are also considering ceasing the making of all vaccines as well

Read his post he says no jab

@Gkell727 You will have to fill in a passenger location form as well. Which basically means they can check on you if you should be quarantined https://www.gov.uk/foreign-travel-advice/ireland/entry-requirements I think it says that you need to quarantine for 14 days unless you have a negative PCR test in which case it is 5 days minimum

how does a virus even live in Ireland with all the rain

Verified (the underscore was the proof)

I don’t intend to get into a discussion on the topic as I don’t agree with the whole idea it but that’s neither here nor there. looking at your site and your pricing level you charge based on a streamers average views. So let’s say I stream and have an average of 100 viewers per stream, the cost to me of becoming “verified” is €60 for a year. Now I would assume that you only charge if I am actually given the “verified” badge otherwise what am I paying for. Therefore there is an immediate conflict of interest - if you dont approve the streamer you don’t get paid. This will also be an annual revenue from that streamer so there is financial hit to you in not verifying someone. A second question would be will you publish streamers you have refused to verify ? Otherwise they will just say they have chosen not to get verified with you but the truth is they couldn’t get verified with you - the average joe would just never know. Finally, a lot of people make the point about needing some credibility. What if someone more credible than you comes along and does the same thing, and someone already verified with you now needs to be verified with the new company to satisfy their viewers. I think a lot of people will see this a moneyspinner and start trying to do the same thing and before you know streamers will have multiple “verified” badges on their stream each one as worthless as the last etc.

yee and you get a verified certificate like you own the land for real

I think on only fans having fake ones is supposed to help

I am playing much less than before even when I play I play low bets just for fun 20p 40p before use to play £2 £3 £4

https://www.boredpanda.com/funny-unfortunate-names/?utm_source=google&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=organic

Certainly not " going after " . All I'm saying is if new regulations deter people from playing which i think it will do as has probably already done then that's a good thing imo.

Phil, you've ignored or skipped a post and the head point of all of this. People will struggle to trust UKGC if they were verifying streamers. Your site has no chance. The head point is that you have offered NO proof. As it stands, verifiedstreamer.com is not trusted. There is nothing to base the trust on. Literally nothing.

A lad 3 or 4 years above me in my school in Wales was called Ewan Kerr. It wasn't a happy time for him.

I still remember watching this fight live

@ISlot Seen it before but still good

If he gets his name on that list I think he will lose his respect I personally will close all my accounts I open from his links to support him

You say we're all fucked if the regulators clamp down. Maybe this may just persuade people not to bother playing in the first place.I'd guess you would say this would drive people to unlicensed rogue casinos but if people were to do that they would only get done once. That's better than losing your wages every week on payday.I've had many debates with you regarding responsible online slotting and i still believe it's near on impossible to play slots responsibly but that's another matter. Maybe it's because it's your livelihood but personally i can't see how someone is so passionate about an industry that's corrupt ruins lives and causes suicides. I get you are trying to protect your own interests here and it's your line of work but if your concern is regulations will change then i hope they do change and this drives thousands upon thousands of people to say you know what i can't be arsed with playing online anymore it's too much hassle I'm closing my account then good imo. I'll give you an example. Missus gamstop expired over a year ago. Every now and again I'll tell her a story about someone who's come on the forum with withdrawal problems. Sow checks. Id checks and remind her of the changes because of recent regulations ( slow spins bonus buys etc). She isn't interested anymore thank fuck but i know if it had been easier to play she would of carried on straight from where she left off and that probably goes for me as well.

Mike Tyson Gives Evander Holyfield His Ear Back

Well done @4houghts and great stuff again the tgc putting these things together

Looks fake to me but nice hit!

Great hit @Jok3st3r Well done, congratulations

Thanks beautiful ♥ I've loved every minute of it this week, Mollie will be pleased that the racing channel is finally off

A massive well done to @4houghts, who put his Ascot disappointment behind him with a thoroughly deserved victory in the Goodwood overall comp. His closest pursuers did score today, but ultimately it was in vain. Congrats @4houghts a well deserved trophy in the cabinet. Runner up spot to @Cleandries with @Fredthedog1 in 3rd, and @Chrissy_M an honourable 4th.

I guess literally anything I say on this topic won’t be approved.

17:15 HQ - Alflaila 18:00 Bath - Flash Betty 19:05 Bath - TYNWALD - NAP 19:40 Bath - Silver Gunn 4 Single Wins with the biggest stake on the Nap Also a cheeky Lucky Miller = Lucky 15 Not done one in years but I'm feeling horny

First race is a no go, 20 runners over 2 and half miles you’ve got better chance picking up Pamela Anderson on Weymouth beach. Second race you’ve got Baaeed, looks unbeatable but at 4/6 on we’ll give that a miss. Race 3, 20 runners over a mile, on the face of it looks like a swerve but with the 3 year old allowance looks like a good opportunity to fine a good 3 year old miler. Roscolyn at 9/1, won at goodwood before, has won on soft ground which bodes well for the forecast rain and gets the 9lb 3 year old allowance. 3.35 (race four) Battaash great horse, doesn’t seem to like the ground too soft. Dragon symbol 2nd fav, 3/1. Only ever had six runs, loves the ground soft and stays 6 furlongs so the stamina for that will help over over the stiff 5 here. Art power is an alternative but 5 might be a bit sharp and form is questionable. Race 5, 4.10. A horse I was looking out for as soon as the meeting started, Pablo Escobar 12/1. Has yet to fully prove himself on soft ground but three starts at the course has yielded 2 wins and a 2nd. Has some strong from against the likes of Anthony Van Dyk and Sir Ron Priestly. 4.45, race 6. 2 year olds, too many runners, too much risk and too many pints of Sagres to determine a winner. Race 7, not much to like tbh. Bit of a shit race a definitely at the end of this race up. One piece of form that sticks out is General lee at 20/1. Debut over 7 furlongs, 3/4 lengths behind Baradar who was only 3 lengths behind Mac sweeney in a group 1 over a mile on heavy ground. General lee is a three year old with potential who just won over 1 mile 2 looking like the step up in trip will suit. Too long, didn’t read? Advised bets 3.00 - Rhoscolyn 9/1 3.35 - Dragon Symbol 3/1 - Danger Art Power 6/1 4.10 - Pablo Escobar 12/1 5.20 - General Lee 20/1 My analysis for Day four, I have had a few Sagres so excuse the length and probable lack of knowledge.

It's as sinister as fook mate. They are using every dirty trick in the book to coherce the young to be jabbed with an experimental substance they don't need for a condition that's not going to affect them. It's clear as day the jabs are going to harm them more than the virus ever will. Also this narrative about the unvaccinated being a danger, who's really more likely to be incubating dangerous mutated covid strains, the vaccinated with all those various assorted leaky vaccines or the unvaccinataed?, it's not difficult to work who the real danger is here and that the narrative is complete BS.

Hope you got BOG

@therealwintersoldier I forgot to mention about this fella, sure it was short but I never forget them and he put some gravy on the table Remember it ? If only they all won like that eh. https://www.sportinglife.com/racing/results/2021-07-13/brighton/636349/mansionbet-bet-10-get-20-median-auction-maiden-stakes

Registered in Cyprus and licensed in Curacao 100% dodgy and absolutely no reason to use them when you can bet on e Sports at reputable bookmakers If you do use them and win, good luck getting paid, there's a reason these guys are based in Cyprus!

Not much went right today That's racing

Yes you need to a a covid vaccine cert to enter any of the premises such as pubs or restaurants https://www.gov.ie/en/press-release/7894b-post-cabinet-statement-resilience-and-recovery-the-path-ahead/ https://www.gov.ie/en/publication/77952-government-advice-on-international-travel/#passengers-arriving-into-ireland-from-outside-eueea-eu-iceland-lichtenstein-and-norway You will also have to wear a mask when entering most shops

@Mad Slasher McGurk I'm pretty much being emotionally blackmailed at work to get both jabs

is bandit get verified by you? or his refusing?